<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Squoosh™, or Not to Squoosh™?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6</link>
	<description>the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:26:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TypeOff. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One-dimensional font scaling</title>
		<link>http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>TypeOff. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One-dimensional font scaling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] kind of neat, and is just like an exercise we did during our first design workshop here at Reading. Paul and Rob, this link is for the both of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kind of neat, and is just like an exercise we did during our first design workshop here at Reading. Paul and Rob, this link is for the both of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keller</title>
		<link>http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I feel ripped off... You guys are learning a lot that we missed out on. No one ever specifically told us not to swoosh... nor did anyone explain that the &quot;horizontal strokes must be thinner than horizontal strokes.&quot; 


Off topic – I hope the room is working out ok, and you are liking Reading and the experience so far.

Cheers,
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel ripped off&#8230; You guys are learning a lot that we missed out on. No one ever specifically told us not to swoosh&#8230; nor did anyone explain that the &#8220;horizontal strokes must be thinner than horizontal strokes.&#8221; </p>
<p>Off topic – I hope the room is working out ok, and you are liking Reading and the experience so far.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TypeOff. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UoR Unger workshop #1</title>
		<link>http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>TypeOff. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UoR Unger workshop #1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Hunt has also written a bit about the workshop on his Pilcrow Type blog. I&#8217;ve posted some photos on my flickr space, and for MATD goodies, there is always the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hunt has also written a bit about the workshop on his Pilcrow Type blog. I&#8217;ve posted some photos on my flickr space, and for MATD goodies, there is always the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pilcrowtype.com/blog/archives/6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Great post, Paul. I&#039;m glad you&#039;ve started a blog.

Unger talked a bit about this in a recent article in &lt;em&gt;Eye&lt;/em&gt;. The &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; did compress his Gulliver quite a bit, but it isn&#039;t nearly as damaging as it would be to other typefaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Paul. I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ve started a blog.</p>
<p>Unger talked a bit about this in a recent article in <em>Eye</em>. The <em>USA Today</em> did compress his Gulliver quite a bit, but it isn&#8217;t nearly as damaging as it would be to other typefaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
